🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions regarding the comments delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over the American player in the US Open last eight. Look – Fritz is American, the commentator is from the US – and sports often encourage nationalism. A little bit of disappointment was appropriate. Instead, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

We all love a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, whom he has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually preferred his path, because it presented the chance to beat the top three players in the world back-to-back. Fritz is well within his right to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of ranking points away. His top-class serve and powerful power on each forehand and reverse side are more than adequate to defeat the majority of rivals on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, though, he is frequently helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting rise of tall, gangly players who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and fluidity of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

The American has made a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. Two years after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing slump of US male players winning major titles when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a victory that only felt uncertain for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American creating plenty of chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the brink of frustration. When he finally did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve once more; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite ironclad proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, that lost to Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is those who were expecting the American to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just express how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America not spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a major. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {